Your POSH file is compliant. The question is whether your committee could run an inquiry next Tuesday.
An audit of whether the POSH system works, not whether it exists. It scores the organisation out of 100 across four pillars and twenty parameters, runs a live rehearsal on the committee, tests the complaint channels with dummy complaints, surveys the culture without asking anyone whether they have been harassed, and checks what happened to the people who complained.
Not a compliance checklist. Not a policy review. Not a training. It is the system under pressure, scored, with the fix designed into it.
Read the record first: the policies, the committee orders, the external member's contract and conflicts, twenty-four months of inquiries, and the filings. Test the complaint channels with dummy complaints, audit the access logs, and deploy the survey. Walk the committee through a live scenario with three complications, and interview the presiding officer, the external member, the CHRO and the general counsel. Name the score, the level, and the one pattern behind the weakest pillar. Fix it into the mechanism, with the legal fixes first because they are the ones with a date attached.
A secure data room, the committee files, anonymised HR data for the retaliation review, and four hours with the committee for the rehearsal. One point of contact. And the committee must be told nothing about the scenario in advance, or the rehearsal measures nothing.
An organisation had a properly constituted committee, an appointed external member and an annual training. The rehearsal found the committee could not issue interim relief in the first ten minutes, and had never read the ninety-day clock. The fix was the first hour, written down and rehearsed.
₹1,50,000 to ₹4,00,000, by scope.
What moves it: the number of sites and committees, and whether retaliation data exists.
If the pattern is real, you will know within a week. If it is not, we say so in writing.
Request a Proposal