Hiring · LeakMap
You have replaced the role four times in two years, and every exit interview says something different. The pattern is not in who leaves. It is in what the hiring process promised them before they arrived.
One week. One problem. One confirmed figure.
Three places it usually lives. We find which one is yours.
The interview tests the wrong thing.
The panel scores for the skill that is easy to see, and never tests the thing the role actually fails on.
The promise made at the interview.
What the candidate was told about the role, the growth and the team is not what they meet on day one. They leave when they notice.
The first ninety days nobody owns.
The hire is handed over and forgotten until the review, by which time the decision to leave is already made.
We read the record of your last several hires, the scorecards, the offers, the first ninety days and the exits, and find the pattern that keeps producing the same departure. Then we design the change into the hiring process itself, so the wrong hire is hard to make rather than easy to avoid.
A short report and a read-out: the pattern behind the repeat hires, the evidence for it, and the change designed into your hiring process.
One week, one role, one confirmed figure. If the pattern is real, you will see it in the first hires we read. If it is not, we say so in writing.
If the pattern is real, you will know within a week. If it is not, we say so in writing.
If the pattern is real, you will know within a week. If it is not, we say so in writing.
Request a Proposal