Handwriting-based behavioral screening for hiring. Per batch of candidates + analysis report. Consent required.
₹15,000–₹40,000/batch | $250–$600/batch
Request Scope Proposal →The hiring-domain Leak Scan: the role you keep reposting, the interview loop that keeps clearing the wrong candidates, the onboarding week that keeps losing them.
₹25,000–₹40,000 | $400–$600
Request Scope Proposal →Both engagements end in documents you can act from and a call where you can question them. Here is what lands on your desk, item by item.
₹25,000–₹40,000 | $400–$600
₹15,000–₹40,000/batch | $250–$600/batch
The Hiring Pattern Audit is the hiring-domain Leak Scan, and it runs the same delivery arc as every EWR investigation. The method behind it, the 8-step Pattern Intelligence Method, is on the The Method page.
You submit the scope proposal form. Rashi replies within 48 hours with a fixed-scope, fixed-price proposal, and the written scope note names what is in, what is out, and what it costs. You approve it by email and pay the 50% advance. Nothing starts before that.
A 30-minute kickoff call captures your hiring question in your own words, and the interview calendar is booked on that call. Then fieldwork: job descriptions, offer and decline data, interview notes, onboarding records, three to five structured interviews, and at least one live observation of the interview loop. The fieldwork log is written the same day.
Each finding is mapped to its named pattern and its 7-stage loop, from trigger to lock-in, then costed with the basis of the estimate stated. Where the audit makes a claim about cost or recurrence, it also says how that claim could be disproven.
Every finding must trace to an artefact: a document reviewed, an interview quote, an observation logged with a date, or a metric with its source. What rests on inference is labelled a hypothesis, not dressed up as a fact. Before anything leaves EWR it passes a quality gate covering evidence traceability and price consistency.
You get one high-impact action with a Poka-Yoke safeguard, plus a priced ladder of follow-on work, so you know what to fix first and what it costs before you commit.
The 60-minute read-through call takes the Leak Map first, findings second, actions last. Your questions from the call are answered in writing within 24 hours, and the final report is issued after. Thirty days later, a scheduled pattern-check email asks whether the pattern is holding.
The audit runs this arc in one week. A Pre-Hiring Assessment batch runs on your hiring calendar: samples in, consent logged, and the batch report back within the window agreed in the scope note.
A report is easiest to trust when you can see one. Below is a single finding from a Hiring Pattern Audit, redrawn as an anonymized composite from real investigations. No client, site, or person is identifiable.
The same team-leader role has been posted three times in fourteen months, and the requisition file carries the same phrase each time: strong communicator, immediate joiner. Offer and attrition data show the leavers clustered at eleven months, and the interview notes show a panel that scored confidence in the room above the evidence in the file. Observation of two interview loops shows why: the candidate who talks fluently about ownership gets the offer, and the quiet candidate who has actually run the process does not. New joiners are then onboarded into silence, with no named buddy in week one and no question slot in the daily huddle. The pattern is the Interviewer Mirror loop: the panel hires its own presentation style, the gap surfaces at the 90-day mark, the exit interview records “growth opportunity”, the requisition opens again, and the repost normalises the churn. Estimated cost: Rs. 2.6 lakh per refill (basis: agency fee plus screening hours plus the ramp months at partial productivity, from the HR ledger). If the next three hires from this panel reach the 18-month mark without the question slot existing, this reading is wrong.
The same finding as it appears on the Leak Map:
| # | Finding | Pattern Named | Loop Stage | Est. Monthly Cost | Severity | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Team-leader role reposted three times in 14 months | Interviewer Mirror | Stage 5 — Reinforcement | Rs. 55,000 | 4 / 5 | Score the file before the conversation; add a question slot to onboarding |
That is the discipline in every finding: an artefact, a named pattern, the loop, the cost with its basis, and the test that would prove the reading wrong. The anonymized Case Studies page shows what changed after findings like this landed.
Founder and Lead Investigator, EvolveWithRashi
Rashi Mathur spent 17 years leading global Quality and Training functions across BPO, manufacturing, and tech before founding EvolveWithRashi. She has hired, trained, and investigated the hiring behind hundreds of frontline and team-leader roles, and she reads an interview floor the way she once read a production line: as a process with failure modes. She is a Six Sigma Master Black Belt, a certified graphologist, and a certified POSH and POCSO professional.
She leads every Hiring Pattern Audit personally and signs every report. Nothing leaves the practice without passing her quality gate.
Serious money deserves an honest boundary. Here is what these engagements do and do not do, how payment works, and where the policies live.
Submit the scope proposal form, and Rashi replies within 48 hours with a fixed-scope, fixed-price proposal. You pay nothing until you have approved the scope note, so you will know exactly what is in, what is out, and what it costs before any money moves.
Request a Scope Proposal →Prefer a conversation first? WhatsApp +91 99673 03364.
